Dear Tianchao, please send this as input to the public comments. We will discuss the issue with the authors and especially wrt to interoperability issues that might arise having implementations including WS-Negotiation and such without. Best regards Wolfgang Tianchao Li schrieb:
I understand. But what do you think if we clarify in the specification to allow the usage of WS-Notification wherever appropriate?
Best regards, Tianchao
t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
This was in order to make it possible for implementations which do not use WS-Notification.
Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
I noticed that WS-Notification is missing in the current specification: 1. notification of agreement acceptance is currently via custom port type. 2. the agreement status port does not extend the WS-Notification port type.
Are there any specific reasons?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
==================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen Germany http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms