On Mar 22, Toshiyuki Nakata loaded a tape reading:
Sorry to ask many snippets of questions rather than chunk them to gether.
If an initiator issed five different createPendingAgreement operations, May I understand that it is the initiator's responsibility to create 5 different initiatorAcceptance EPR so that the response might be discriminated properly?
Yes, that is the idea... just like with the deliverNotification pattern in WS-BaseNotification. There is nothing particularly expensive about creating EPRs, e.g. new addressable resources. The alternative goes right back into the explicit correlation ID mess, which has all the same requirements for initiators keeping track of IDs and you still have to pass an EPR too. It hurts my brain to think about <EPR, ID> pairs for addressing. :-) Oh, I see your other email about using the Agreement EPR as a correlation ID. I think that is about the only way to upset the WSRF and anti-WSRF folks equally... ;-) I think EPRs should only be passed around when there is an expectation that a recipient will eventually invoke operations on it. karl -- Karl Czajkowski karlcz@univa.com