Hi: Stephen M Pickles wrote:
All,
1.) In case it helps Toshi to complete his action, I've attached a word document containing the comments I posted to the WS-Agreement public comment tracker, and I've indicated the items that _I_ think might require discussion.
Thank you very much.
2.) In what timezone(s) will the meetings be one hour earlier? I ask because in today's telcon of GGF compute area chairs (which started at the same time as the GRAAP telcon), we thought it would be a good idea in future to hold the compute area telcon (which will be held on the last Wednesday of each month) half an hour earlier to avoid clashing with the GRAAP telcon. So if we do that, will we just be ensuring that we clash again next month?
The reason is that day light saving time ends in US and Europe. Since Japan is too near the equator and does not have daylight saving time, if the time is not moved one hour earlier for US and Europe, it would mean that the for JST (GMT +9) the starting time would be one hour late.. (And means that in Japan the telecon would start from 1 AM, which would be a bit tough for people in Japan.) So, one option which the other participants kindly agrfeedd to had been to shift the meeting one hour earlier in US and Europe after the daylight saving time starts so that at least for people in Japan, it would still be from midnight. Best Regards Toshi
Best wishes,
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: owner-graap-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Pruyne Sent: 26 October 2005 16:39 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: [graap-wg] Minutes from Oct. 26 telecon
Minutes from October 26 '05 Telecon
Attendees ---------
Jim Pruyne Toshi Nakata Heiko Ludwig Asit Dan
Discussion ----------
- Let's move the meeting time one hour earlier because of daylight savings time in the US and EU. We'll do that starting next week.
- The URL for the public comments has been sent out.
- Toshi to group the large comment list from Stephen Pickles into the grammar ones vs. the ones that require discussion.
- Managing the responses could be handled a little more formally, so we should be more clear on exactly what to be posted in a reply on the public comment tracker.
- There was some concern at GGF that people could not tell how we were making decisions. Heiko proposes that we make our process clear in an e-mail to the mailing list. Jim will do this.
-- Toshiyuki Nakata t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 8-22-60210)