Hi Karl:
but unfortunately my archive does not retain the Word document attachment, so I cannot review the specific changes. (Does anyone know of a public archive where I can easily retrieve such GRAAP messages with attachments?)
Please refer to Section 8.4 in http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/graap-wg/2004/11/doc00000.doc which had been refererred from http://www-unix.gridforum.org/mail_archive/graap-wg/2004/11/msg00004.html
Just based on the above summary, I would say that I am proposing we drop the createAgreementGetResult operation in favor of an equivalent binding-level behavior to reliably get (or "re-get" by polling) the result of the existing createAgreement call in case it takes too long for the baseline bindings. I am also proposing that we attempt to incorporate his notion of a "reverse direction" createAgreementResult operation (which I separated as acceptAgreement and rejectAgreement) into a repair for the now underspecified and broken symmetric agreement pattern.
Does anybody else have opinions on these issues?
Will there be a
GRAAP call today (Monday 20 Feb)?
From Jim's subsequen mail, probably no.. Best Regards Toshi
karl
-- Toshiyuki Nakata t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 8-22-60210)