
14 June 2007 15:00 UK time Attendance: Laurence Field Maarten Litmaath Felix Ehm Ellen Stokes Gabriele Garzoglio Balazs Konya Sergio Andreozzi Stephen Burke BK: Was there anything relevant from the last OGSA meeting for this group? LF: Only that the Glue Schema groups seems to be accepted as the place where work on the schema should be done. SA: The SAS group presented some other their use cases SA: The use case template has be updated to take into consideration the feedback from OGF 20. More use cases have been added. Action: LF to create the draft document which should be ready by the 26th of June, in time for the next OGSA meeting. SA: We should try google docs. LF: Will do. LF: The reference model group needs to help us with the main entities (Site, Service, Resource) and the relationships between them. Action: ES will bring this up in the next reference model phone call. BZ: The reference model group should take a look at the main entities that we have defined. SA: Not much work has been done on the CE schema since OGF20. Only general capability and APAC use cases. LF: Need to wait for the draft use case document before moving forward LF: We needs to start moving forward on the SE schema ??: What groups do we need to consider other than the SRM group Action: LF to poll information from Glue, JSDL and OGSA email lists. Action: The SE use cases from Glue 1.3 should be uploaded Action: Need to find someone to coordinate the SE schema definition work. Action: People should send suggestions of who could to this to LF. SA: I will be going the the DMTF meeting in July to present the Glue Schema work. I will sent around the presentation for comments and suggestions. Next Meeting: OGSA phone call 28 June.

Hi Laurence, I've added them in a wiki page: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeeting2... I would suggest to put phoneconf details and minutes on the wiki and to provide links to them. For this activity: Laurence Field wrote:
Action: Need to find someone to coordinate the SE schema definition work.
I volunteer myself for the task of coordinating the definition of the SE schema. As regards, the use cases, I guess they fall into your coordination activity of use cases. Cheers, Sergio

glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org
[mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Laurence Field said: LF: The reference model group needs to help us with the main entities (Site, Service, Resource) and the relationships between them.
I propose an entity called the jabberwock - people want to search for it and know what its properties are, but no-one quite knows what it is or what the name means :)
SA: Not much work has been done on the CE schema since OGF20. Only general capability and APAC use cases.
LF: Need to wait for the draft use case document before moving forward
From some of the recent discussion about job priorities we could do with some use cases related to the ACBR ... Jeff Templon might like to contribute?
Stephen
participants (3)
-
Burke, S (Stephen)
-
Laurence Field
-
Sergio Andreozzi