Hi all, I didn't notice yesterday but I am a bit worried with JP's guidelines. I think discussing topics just after Stephen's slides will give the auditorium a biased view. I'd prefer to present my slides after his ones, so the auditorium will get a feeling of the two views. Then, of course will be easier to discuss, once everybody knows both sides of story. I would prefer people listen to both presentations and take notes during the 22nd session, and have a dedicated discussion session on the 5th. This is a request I am submitting to the group, because for a year I submitted and implemented modifications to a draft that is now being questioned for not being acceptable, so my one year of work following this subject now (suprisingly) risks to be completely in vain. The sad thing is that I don't really understand the reason, as we never had a real discussion on the document itself, taking the changes one by one. With all respect, I think is fair enough if I explain my points (that is, the changes) *before* we discuss. I don't think Stephen's presentation explains my choices. And I don't want to discuss if people has no understanding of my point of view. A final draft is the *real output* of these meetings, please bear that in mind. Once a document is choosen, we will need to review that one. It might be a merge of the two. The final draft might trigger code modifications for implementors. Please don't underestimate this as well. Cheers, Florido On 2013-10-21 15:49, JP Navarro wrote:> Greetings Glue WG,

Coordinates and agenda for tomorrow's GLUE WG teleconference follow: : Tuesday, October 22, 2013 : 16:00-17:30 Central Europe, 10:00-11:30 AM US Eastern

Teleconference and screen sharing: : https://webconf.vc.dfn.de/ogf-glue-wg/ (Adobe Connect) : Login as Guest using your real name

Agenda: 1) Stephen will present the attached LDAP rendering slides.

It is important that we get thru Stephen's material, and that we

understand it. Please limit your questions to requests for clarification. Privately take note of significant concerns or disagreements. After Stephen's presentation we will use remaining time to discuss concerns. If necessary we can move those discussion to the e-mail list or a future next meeting.

If after Stephen's presentation and subsequent concerns discussions

there is any time left, and participants can continue, we can discuss material Florido would like to present. In the likely event that we don't have time we will schedule Florido's presentation for the November 5th meeting. We also have a "Cloud Extensions" discussion that will use time on November 5th.

Thanks,

JP Navarro and Shiraz Memon

_______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg

-- ================================================== Florido Paganelli ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration System Administrator Lund University Department of Physics Division of Particle Physics BOX118 221 00 Lund Office Tel: 046-2220272 Email: florido.paganelli@REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli ==================================================