Hi, Please find attached an initial draft of the SE schema. This is an attempt to consolidate all the input which I have received. It is important that we define the main entities and the relationship between those entities as soon as possible, so please focus on that rather than the individual attributes. The attributes should be used as a guide to what the main entities are. I will arrange a phone conference next Thursday 31 May, so that we can dicuss this futher. Thanks, Laurence
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Laurence Field wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached an initial draft of the SE schema. This is an attempt to consolidate all the input which I have received. It is important that we define the main entities and the relationship between those entities as soon as possible, so please focus on that rather than the individual attributes. The attributes should be used as a guide to what the main entities are. I will arrange a phone conference next Thursday 31 May, so that we can dicuss this futher.
What happened to the Storage Component etc. that we first wanted for v1.3? I think the SRM group will need to digest this and comment...
glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org
[mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Maarten.Litmaath@cern.ch said: What happened to the Storage Component etc. that we first wanted for v1.3? I think the SRM group will need to digest this and comment...
It would be good to get some experience with the 1.3 schema ... I would like to see a concrete use case for the storage component, the reason I argued against it for 1.3 was that it wasn't clear to me that there was a real need for it. Stephen
participants (3)
-
Burke, S (Stephen) -
Laurence Field -
Maarten.Litmaath＠cern.ch