Dear all, this is a reminder for our today telecom on Storage (2 PM CEST ): http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeet ing20080414_1 Cheers, Felix --- Felix Ehm IT-GD tel : +41 22 7674580 CERN, Switzerland -----------------------------------------
Hi all, On Monday 14 April 2008 10:41:34 Felix Nikolaus Ehm wrote:
this is a reminder for our today telecom on Storage (2 PM CEST ): http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeet ing20080414_1
We're holding a dCache developers workshop all this week. I'll try to attend the phone conference, but please accept my apologies if I can't make it. Cheers, Paul.
glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org
[mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Felix Nikolaus Ehm said: this is a reminder for our today telecom on Storage (2 PM CEST ): http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki /PhoneMeet ing20080414_1
It seems that the draft hasn't been updated for a while [1], and in particular doesn't have either the Datastore proposal or the "shared share" attributes. Is there any chance of getting that done so we can see where we are at the moment? I'm also not sure what the current status of Environment is supposed to be - personally I think we need some high-level aggregated Capacity information somewhere. Stephen [1] Actually the date on the document is March 6th! However, the version history says April 6th.
Felix Nikolaus Ehm wrote:
Dear all,
this is a reminder for our today telecom on Storage (2 PM CEST ): http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/PhoneMeet ing20080414_1
in the document repository, I've uploaded a new draft for discussion. This inclues what we agreed on Friday, plus my tentative view/understanding on integrating the datastore concept: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/projects.glue-wg/docman.root.drafts I've tried also to capture the fact that a storage share can be composed of both shared and dedicated space. The current limitation of this approach is that it is not possible to understand which shares participate in a shared area. From my storage colleagues, I understood that the shared areas can be fragmented across different combinations of participants and it is not easy to capture them. Talking to you in a few minutes. Cheers, Sergio
participants (4)
-
Burke, S (Stephen) -
Felix Nikolaus Ehm -
Paul Millar -
Sergio Andreozzi