
Hi, I have been looking at the current draft of GLUE 2.0 to see how our existing infrastructure deployed on GLUE 1.2 (with APACGrid extensions) would move to GLUE 2.0, and I have realized that the LRMSType_t type used for the LRMSType field lists only two schedulers - "openpbs" and "lsf" - even though there is a number of others used around ("LoadLeveler", "SGE", "Torque" ... and few other flavours of PBS, which might have an entry on its own). I see that the field is typed as an Open enumeration, and at the syntactical level, it may not be necessary to list all the possible values in the specification. But I think that the widely used schedulers should be included - what's the general opinion on this? Thanks in advance for the feedback. Best Regards, Vladimir Mencl -- Vladimir Mencl, Ph.D. Advanced Systems Technology Developer Information Technology Services University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand vladimir.mencl@canterbury.ac.nz (021) 997-352 (03) 364 2987, ext. 3012 FAX: +64 3 364 2332

Hi Vladimir, Vladimir Mencl wrote:
I have been looking at the current draft of GLUE 2.0 to see how our existing infrastructure deployed on GLUE 1.2 (with APACGrid extensions) would move to GLUE 2.0, and I have realized that the LRMSType_t type used for the LRMSType field lists only two schedulers - "openpbs" and "lsf" - even though there is a number of others used around ("LoadLeveler", "SGE", "Torque" ... and few other flavours of PBS, which might have an entry on its own).
I see that the field is typed as an Open enumeration, and at the syntactical level, it may not be necessary to list all the possible values in the specification. But I think that the widely used schedulers should be included - what's the general opinion on this?
sure. All the open enumeration have to be consistently extended with the well-known values. This is something that we will address in on e of the next telecons. Cheers, Sergio -- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi
participants (2)
-
Sergio Andreozzi
-
Vladimir Mencl