GLUE 2.1 draft ready for internal comments
Dear all, as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BpeTBQfCn8xRo4Ff38esRhBwzoUHE4bVxba2rEAz... - all the new classes are highlighted in yellow and are also listed at the end of the document in the appendix C, together new attributes added to the existing classes and new data types; - some attributes are highlighted as well because either modified or added over the past months/years discussions; - I've update the links in the Reference chapter. There is one link I wasn't able to find: Open Grid Forum reference Model 2.0. For some other documents, I found them into https://redmine.ogf.org/projects/glue-wg , I don't know if there is a more official link... please verify all the links - If I've well understood, in the list of authors we should include only the people contributing to this version, shouldn't we? Best regards, Alessandro -- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin
glue-wg <glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org> On Behalf Of Alessandro Paolini said:
as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments:
Is it OK to put comments into the google doc directly? Also, it seems that there are some anonymous changes, presumably it would be better to know who things come from? Stephen
hi Stephen, yes, you can comment directly on the google doc. Perhaps the anonymous people, if there isn't a way for registering and if their name doesn't appear, could add their initials/name to the comment. cheers, Alessandro On 27 June 2018 at 16:47, Stephen Burke - UKRI STFC < stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
glue-wg <glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org> On Behalf Of Alessandro Paolini said:
as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments:
Is it OK to put comments into the google doc directly? Also, it seems that there are some anonymous changes, presumably it would be better to know who things come from?
Stephen
-- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin
Passing on some information I provided to Alessandro in a message off the list: Just FYI, it is likely that the GFSG will vote to require git-based sources to be provided as the master copies for all documents going forward, so the sooner you make the transition to working in markdown out of GitHub instead of Google Docs (or Microsoft Word or TeX), the better. Reasons include better ability to track and comment separately on proposed revisions, more history and ability to track differences between published document versions, better ability to correlate related sets of documents and supplementary information (such as schemas) with each other, ability to provide associated open source reference code, and better correspondence with working practices of the community. Additionally, we have been asked to reduce the VM footprint of OGF tools by Indiana University, which has been providing hosting for OGF tools such as the web site, Redmine, and our existing repositories, and GitHub has agreed to provide unlimited perpetual repository hosting, both public and private, to OGF at no cost to the organization. This transition may likely take place before this document is ready for publication. Let me know if you have any questions. Alan On Jun 27, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini@egi.eu<mailto:alessandro.paolini@egi.eu>> wrote: hi Stephen, yes, you can comment directly on the google doc. Perhaps the anonymous people, if there isn't a way for registering and if their name doesn't appear, could add their initials/name to the comment. cheers, Alessandro On 27 June 2018 at 16:47, Stephen Burke - UKRI STFC <stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk<mailto:stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk>> wrote: glue-wg <glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org<mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org>> On Behalf Of Alessandro Paolini said:
as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments:
Is it OK to put comments into the google doc directly? Also, it seems that there are some anonymous changes, presumably it would be better to know who things come from? Stephen -- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org<mailto:glue-wg@ogf.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ogf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fglue-wg&data=02%7C01%7Calan.sill%40ttu.edu%7C05c5ef0c93534af01bcc08d5dc3ef22e%7C178a51bf8b2049ffb65556245d5c173c%7C0%7C0%7C636657085300499288&sdata=IgsCZASpexxtOd06E5e8HVOTCWRo8h1kOnzjqLmyALM%3D&reserved=0
Hey Alan, Who/how will all the old material be migrated to a git-based repository? Unless someone does that how can we reduce our Indiana University footprint? Incidentally, there appear to be tools that can convert Google docs to markdown… Thanks, JP
On Jun 28, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Sill, Alan <Alan.Sill@ttu.edu <mailto:Alan.Sill@ttu.edu>> wrote:
Passing on some information I provided to Alessandro in a message off the list:
Just FYI, it is likely that the GFSG will vote to require git-based sources to be provided as the master copies for all documents going forward, so the sooner you make the transition to working in markdown out of GitHub instead of Google Docs (or Microsoft Word or TeX), the better. Reasons include better ability to track and comment separately on proposed revisions, more history and ability to track differences between published document versions, better ability to correlate related sets of documents and supplementary information (such as schemas) with each other, ability to provide associated open source reference code, and better correspondence with working practices of the community. Additionally, we have been asked to reduce the VM footprint of OGF tools by Indiana University, which has been providing hosting for OGF tools such as the web site, Redmine, and our existing repositories, and GitHub has agreed to provide unlimited perpetual repository hosting, both public and private, to OGF at no cost to the organization.
This transition may likely take place before this document is ready for publication.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Alan
On Jun 27, 2018, at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini@egi.eu <mailto:alessandro.paolini@egi.eu>> wrote:
hi Stephen,
yes, you can comment directly on the google doc. Perhaps the anonymous people, if there isn't a way for registering and if their name doesn't appear, could add their initials/name to the comment.
cheers, Alessandro
On 27 June 2018 at 16:47, Stephen Burke - UKRI STFC <stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk <mailto:stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk>> wrote: glue-wg <glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org <mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org>> On Behalf Of Alessandro Paolini said:
as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments:
Is it OK to put comments into the google doc directly? Also, it seems that there are some anonymous changes, presumably it would be better to know who things come from?
Stephen
-- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org <mailto:glue-wg@ogf.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ogf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fglue-wg&data=02%7C01%7Calan.sill%40ttu.edu%7C05c5ef0c93534af01bcc08d5dc3ef22e%7C178a51bf8b2049ffb65556245d5c173c%7C0%7C0%7C636657085300499288&sdata=IgsCZASpexxtOd06E5e8HVOTCWRo8h1kOnzjqLmyALM%3D&reserved=0 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ogf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fglue-wg&data=02%7C01%7Calan.sill%40ttu.edu%7C05c5ef0c93534af01bcc08d5dc3ef22e%7C178a51bf8b2049ffb65556245d5c173c%7C0%7C0%7C636657085300499288&sdata=IgsCZASpexxtOd06E5e8HVOTCWRo8h1kOnzjqLmyALM%3D&reserved=0>
glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org <mailto:glue-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
Hello Alessandro, Inline responses.
On Jun 27, 2018, at 3:13 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini@egi.eu <mailto:alessandro.paolini@egi.eu>> wrote:
Dear all,
as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BpeTBQfCn8xRo4Ff38esRhBwzoUHE4bVxba2rEAz... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BpeTBQfCn8xRo4Ff38esRhBwzoUHE4bVxba2rEAzI-U/edit#>
- all the new classes are highlighted in yellow and are also listed at the end of the document in the appendix C, together new attributes added to the existing classes and new data types; - some attributes are highlighted as well because either modified or added over the past months/years discussions;
- I've update the links in the Reference chapter. There is one link I wasn't able to find: Open Grid Forum reference Model 2.0. For some other documents, I found them into https://redmine.ogf.org/projects/glue-wg <https://redmine.ogf.org/projects/glue-wg> , I don't know if there is a more official link... please verify all the links
This file is here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/12690?download= <https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/12690?download=> I believe it is misnamed. Rather than: gridforge/Drafts/OGF Reference Model v2.3 DRAFT.doc it should have this name from the internal title: gridforge/Drafts/OGF Reference Model v2.0E DRAFT.doc
- If I've well understood, in the list of authors we should include only the people contributing to this version, shouldn't we?
Yes, please remove the previous authors, add the current authors, and list the two current co-chairs: Shiraz Memon*, FZJ JP Navarro*, University of Chicago You should mark the subset of authors that did the editorial work with the ° symbol. Thanks, JP
Best regards, Alessandro
-- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org <mailto:glue-wg@ogf.org> https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
On 27 June 2018 at 16:54, Navarro, JP <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
Hello Alessandro,
Inline responses.
On Jun 27, 2018, at 3:13 AM, Alessandro Paolini <alessandro.paolini@egi.eu> wrote:
Dear all,
as agreed during our last meeting, the Glue 2.1 document is now ready for internal comments:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BpeTBQfCn8xRo4Ff38esRhBwzoUHE 4bVxba2rEAzI-U/edit#
- all the new classes are highlighted in yellow and are also listed at the end of the document in the appendix C, together new attributes added to the existing classes and new data types; - some attributes are highlighted as well because either modified or added over the past months/years discussions;
- I've update the links in the Reference chapter. There is one link I wasn't able to find: Open Grid Forum reference Model 2.0. For some other documents, I found them into https://redmine.ogf.org/ projects/glue-wg , I don't know if there is a more official link... please verify all the links
This file is here: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/12690?download=
I believe it is misnamed. Rather than: gridforge/Drafts/OGF Reference Model v2.3 DRAFT.doc
it should have this name from the internal title: gridforge/Drafts/OGF Reference Model v2.0E DRAFT.doc
- If I've well understood, in the list of authors we should include only the people contributing to this version, shouldn't we?
Yes, please remove the previous authors, add the current authors, and list the two current co-chairs: Shiraz Memon*, FZJ JP Navarro*, University of Chicago
You should mark the subset of authors that did the editorial work with the ° symbol.
Hi JP, thank you, I will do in this way cheers, alessandro
Thanks,
JP
Best regards, Alessandro
-- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
-- Dr. Alessandro Paolini Operations Officer - EGI Foundation Science Park 140 1098 XG Amsterdam The Netherlands skype: alessandro.paolini.egi ********************************* "I believe in the power of laughter and tears" "as an antidote to hatred and terror" "A day without laughter" "is a wasted day" >>> Charlie Chaplin
participants (4)
-
Alessandro Paolini -
Navarro, JP -
Sill, Alan -
Stephen Burke - UKRI STFC