Hi Michael, Michael Parkin wrote:

I met some of the GLUE v2.0 authors last week at OGF23 and we agreed that it would be useful to compare the Usage Record specification and proposed GLUE v2.0 specification. This is so that information about completed jobs in the GLUE v2.0 language can be converted to the Usage Record format for accounting/interoperability purposes.

Please find attached a document that maps GLUE v2.0 concepts to Usage Record properties. The good news is that most of the Usage Record properties seem to have direct equivalents in the proposed GLUE v2.0 specification.

thank you for your detailed comparison. This helps to cover one of the open issues for the public comment period. When we will discuss the integration of your feedback, we'll get back to you. Cheers, Sergio

This was the first time I'd read the proposed GLUE v2.0 specification so I may have missed some things in it. Any feedback is welcome.

Thanks,

Michael.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg

-- Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF, Tel: +39 051 609 2860 Viale Berti Pichat, 6/2 Fax: +39 051 609 2746 40126 Bologna (Italy) Web: http://www.cnaf.infn.it/~andreozzi