
Hi, Paul Millar has pointed out that there's a mistake in the GLUE 1.3 schema definition document: the AccessControlBaseRule attributes for CE, VOView, SA and VOInfo (but not Service) are incorrectly defined as multiplicity 1 (single-valued) when they should be multiplicity * (multi-valued). This is just a documentation error, the schema itself (at least the LDAP implementation) is correct. Is there any suggestion about the best way to record such an erratum? Stephen PS Second attempt to send this, the first one got hit by our forced change of email address ... -- Scanned by iCritical.

Hi Stephen, ... On Friday 24 October 2008 15:54:51 Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
Paul Millar has pointed out that there's a mistake in the GLUE 1.3 schema definition document [...]
In fact, the document has a number (i.e., at least one more ;) very minor errors. These are mostly minor problems in the English, a copy-n-paste error in the table description of UsedNearlineSize, inconsistency between "KB" and "KBytes", etc.
Is there any suggestion about the best way to record such an erratum?
In a previous email, we talked about this OGF group inheriting Glue v1.3, so I would say this forum is authoritative in providing such an errata document. Perhaps we should have a document folder like: Root Folder / Glue 1.3 In that, we have all documents relating to Glue v1.3. We can either provide a (series) or errata against the original document, or provide corrected versions of the document (release n, release n+1, etc.) with a clearly specified changelong. ... or we have just have a wiki page and be done with it :) Cheers, Paul.

I would vote for a wiki page in gridforge with Glue 1.3 errata. Laurence
(series) or errata against the original document, or provide corrected versions of the document (release n, release n+1, etc.) with a clearly specified changelong.
... or we have just have a wiki page and be done with it :)
Cheers,
Paul.
_______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg

Laurence Field wrote:
I would vote for a wiki page in gridforge with Glue 1.3 errata.
I created the wiki page for GLUE 1.3 errata and have linked to the main wiki page: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/GLUE_1_3_Erra... Cheers, Sergio

On Tuesday 28 October 2008 18:29:36 Sergio Andreozzi wrote:
I created the wiki page for GLUE 1.3 errata and have linked to the main wiki page:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/GLUE_1_3_Erra... What's the procedure for adding an erratum to this page? Something simple like: a. someone proposes one or more errata, b. these are discussed at the next GLUE meeting, and c. if agreed upon, added to the wiki page. Cheers, Paul.

glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org
[mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Millar said: Something simple like: a. someone proposes one or more errata, b. these are discussed at the next GLUE meeting, and c. if agreed upon, added to the wiki page.
I would suggest discussing/approving them in the mailing list unless there's something controversial. Who is authorised to write to the wiki? Stephen -- Scanned by iCritical.
participants (4)
-
Burke, S (Stephen)
-
Laurence Field
-
Paul Millar
-
Sergio Andreozzi