
12 May
2009
12 May
'09
3:33 p.m.
Hi David, On 12/mag/09, at 13:44, Sergio Andreozzi wrote:
I added some notes to your comments recorded in the following wiki page: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue-wg/wiki/GLUE20Changes
for the last point of your comment, I added this possible solution: * remove them * add one more section in the table for "implied association ends" or similar; it could be useful for implementors to verify that all associations are taken; it improves readability since not everybody can be deeply familiar with UML as regards the redefinition of association ends, you may want to consider this paper: http://www.springerlink.com/content/518265x223032107/ Cheers, Sergio