The group can add and edit things which are not based on external public comments - no problem. But please document the change when resubmitting, so that the editor can cross-check... Best, Andre. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, JP Navarro <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
David: This change makes sense to me.
Andre: Procedurally how do we handle this since we already closed the comment period and are ready to submit our final XML rendering to Editor review? My assumption is that the purpose of the OGF Editor review is a "non technical sanity check", and the "Last Call" is to allow minor corrections or changes such as this. Could we make this change and explicitly mention it in the Last Call? If nobody comment then it's part of the specification?
Thanks,
JP On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:41 AM, david.meredith@stfc.ac.uk wrote:
hi all, I have one suggestion for a small change for the glue2 XML rendering. Since the Ldap rendering defines 'glue' as the root attribute in an RDN string, similarly we could consider changing the Document Root element from '<Entities>' to '<Glue>'. This is a v.minor change and would be more consistent with the ldap rendering.
What do you think?
David http://redmine.ogf.org/boards/9/topics/29
-------------------------------------------------------------- David Meredith STFC eScience Centre Daresbury Laboratory (A32) Warrington, Cheshire WA4 4AD
email: david.meredith@stfc.ac.uk tel: +44 (0)1925 603762 -- Scanned by iCritical. _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
-- Nothing is really difficult.