I vote for 2) But as Stephen clearly stated, this is equivalent of voting for both. I am, however, happier with a 2.1 extension of the current schema with Cloud Entitites as already stated during meetings. I also quote David's comments that basic original GLUE2.0 entities should be left untouched. Cheers, Florido On 2014-07-23 17:36, JP Navarro wrote:
GLUE Working Group:
We have been discussing two options for using the GLUE schema to describe cloud services. You may review these options here: - http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13294?download=
By August 1, please vote for one of the following options:
1) Use GLUE 2.0 with a Community Practice Profile that details how to describe cloud infrastructure using the existing 2.0 entities 2) Develop GLUE 2.1 adding new Cloud Computing entities (would be 100% backward compatible with GLUE 2.0 for non-Cloud entities)
For reference, a preliminary GLUE 2.1 Specification is available here: - http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/glue-wg/2014-January/001527.html
Regards,
JP _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
-- ================================================== Florido Paganelli ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration System Administrator Lund University Department of Physics Division of Particle Physics BOX118 221 00 Lund Office Location: Fysikum, Hus B, Rum B313 Office Tel: 046-2220272 Email: florido.paganelli@REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli ==================================================