
23 Feb
2011
23 Feb
'11
3:41 p.m.
adrian.taga@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.taga@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Adrian Taga said: The XML schema (draft) does not have this problem. It is constructed such that Associations are redefined as specified in the spec. For example ComputingShare has a ComputingEndpointID member but not a EndpointID member.
OK. So anyone writing translators between XML and LDAP (is anyone doing that yet?) needs to take care, but since the information is there somewhere in both representations there shouldn't be any fundamental problem. Stephen -- Scanned by iCritical.