Hi all, I couldn't follow the end of the meeting as suddenly I couldn't hear you, I guess it's because Shiraz dropped out of the server. I hope we will manage to find an agreement to close the LDAP document. I think me, Stephen and a mediator and whoever wants to follow the proceedings should sat down in front of the document and accept-reject changes. In this way we can also quickly show how things are done in reality and comment about it. As I said, since the integration effort was done during EMI, the implemented technology follows almost all the lines described in that the July 2012 review. And we tried to stick to the real implementation as much as possible. So I don't understand Stephen's fear that current implementations do not follow these guidelines. They actually do! I really think the only dispute is about the DIT tree. I already said many times I'd like at least implementation examples to be there, but if this is so bad, it can be dropped to some other document. I am in for some follow-up meeting to complete Stephen's slides, but mind that I sent a couple of slides with ARC's view on things. At the cost of repeating myself, Stephen slides are the the best summary I've seen about what happened in LDAP so far, as they focused discussion on real problems we had to face during integration. Cheers, Florido -- ================================================== Florido Paganelli ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration System Administrator Lund University Department of Physics Division of Particle Physics BOX118 221 00 Lund Office Tel: 046-2220272 Email: florido.paganelli@REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli ==================================================