I'm no expert on OGF procedures, but is it accurate to say that comments on a finalized standard could simply result in recommended changes to future versions of the standard? Our renderings are also part of the standard, right? Perhaps this also has to do with the distinction between a standard and implementations. Is the statement that OGF produces standards and NOT implementations, accurate? Other organizations besides OGF produce implementation that (hopefully) comply with OGF standards, but none of them is an "OGF implementation". The GLUE2 schema is final, so comments on it will only affect future version of the standard. The GLUE2 renderings are NOT final, correct? Or, is the GLUE2 LDAP rendering final? JP On Oct 7, 2010, at 10:02 AM, <stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk> <stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Sergio Andreozzi said:
the minutes from today call are available here:
On the public comment: I have no problem with that per se, but it would be rather hard to make any significant changes to the LDAP rendering given that we already have it in production!
Stephen -- Scanned by iCritical. _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg