Perhaps we should drop them a friendly email...
+1 On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Paul Millar <paul.millar@desy.de> wrote:
Hi all,
On 08/09/14 16:07, Paul Millar wrote:
The alternative is remove SLA complete and do this outside of GLUE. There are languages for handling SLAs; since GLUE provides persistent IDs for all objects, these SLA languages should be usable with the GLUE ID as the subject.
I found the "languages for handling SLAs" I mentioned: it was the GRAAP-WG, such as WS-Agreement:
http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.192.pdf
and "WS-Agreement Negotiation":
http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.193.pdf
Unfortunately, there seems to be a disconnect between GLUE and GRAAP: I did a simple search for "GLUE" and found no mention in GFD.192.
I would have expected some linkage here; for example, GLUE describes a set of objects and GRAAP describes the SLAs and how to negotiate them.
Perhaps we should drop them a friendly email...
Cheers,
Paul. _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
-- It was a sad and disappointing day when I discovered that my Universal Remote Control did not, in fact, control the Universe. (Not even remotely.)