5 May
2014
5 May
'14
1:20 p.m.
Warren Smith [mailto:wsmith@tacc.utexas.edu] said:
I wouldn't really call the proposed cloud extensions backward compatible either: Will a GLUE 2.0 client be able to understand these extensions? No.
By backward-compatible I mean that changes don't break existing code, either publishers or clients. If new objects are introduced the answer is yes - publishers don't have to publish them, and clients won't query for them and hence won't be disturbed. Stephen -- Scanned by iCritical.