Re: [glue-wg] Enumerations for DPM and related InterfaceNames was: Re: New Endpoint and Service types

Maarten Litmaath [mailto:Maarten.Litmaath@cern.ch] said:

I suspect using capabilities would be better indeed, but there exists plenty of legacy usage that selects on ServiceType. For example, an SE supporting the SRM protocol should publish a record with GlueServiceType=SRM, while _GlueSEImplementationName_ may be "DPM".

The GLUE 1 ServiceType maps to the GLUE 2 EndpointInterfaceName, not the GLUE 2 ServiceType! So in GLUE 2 the *Endpoints* should still have a ImplementationName of SRM, but the ServiceType is new and hence open to definition. Stephen -- Scanned by iCritical.