Hi Stephen, On 2014-04-04 16:13, stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk wrote:
Maarten Litmaath [mailto:Maarten.Litmaath@cern.ch] said:
I suspect using capabilities would be better indeed, but there exists plenty of legacy usage that selects on ServiceType. For example, an SE supporting the SRM protocol should publish a record with GlueServiceType=SRM, while _GlueSEImplementationName_ may be "DPM".
The GLUE 1 ServiceType maps to the GLUE 2 EndpointInterfaceName, not the GLUE 2 ServiceType! So in GLUE 2 the *Endpoints* should still have a ImplementationName of SRM, but the ServiceType is new and hence open to definition.
Stephen
Ok, I misunderstood that. This is very nice. So we're free to suggest and set a new route. Cheers, Florido -- ================================================== Florido Paganelli ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration System Administrator Lund University Department of Physics Division of Particle Physics BOX118 221 00 Lund Office Location: Fysikum, Hus B, Rum B313 Office Tel: 046-2220272 Email: florido.paganelli@REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli ==================================================