17 Apr
2008
17 Apr
'08
4:48 p.m.
Sergio Andreozzi wrote:
I think we should keep the Share - Datastore relation as you can't deduce it in general if you only have Share - Resource. Maybe we could add a Share - Resource relation as well - but do we need it explicitly in the model if it's implied by the existing relations?
in the current modeling, it cannot be implied because storageResource is associated to a dataStore via a many-to-many relationship.
It would have been possible in this case: storageResource 1--* dataStore
I think the relationship must be "1--*" indeed.