29 Jun
2007
29 Jun
'07
10:41 a.m.
glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org
[mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Balazs Konya said: The computing element does not represent an LRMS any longer, the LRMS specific info was moved to the computing resource entity.
I haven't yet read the draft, but my immediate reaction is that that sounds a bit odd. Conceptually the batch system is not the same as the hardware/cluster, so can they really be merged? I think one of the problems we've had with the 1.x schema is that the LRMS is not represented explicitly but merged into the service (CE) info; I'm not sure if merging it with the cluster instead is any better. Is there a reason not to represent the LRMS as a primary entity? Stephen