Hi all, On 2014-06-18 10:40, Maria Alandes Pradillo wrote:
Hi all,
Fundamentally the prefix is just a convenience to avoid name clashes, so I don't think it should be absolutely required, but there should be a good justification, e.g. that the name is widely known and used.
I think I am officially giving up trying to have a consistent naming. Is dragging on since two years now. ARC tried to behave and rewrote all the GLUE2 names to be consistent with the naming scheme. It seems to me that most people coding GLUE2 never read the specs -- not even those who WROTE the specs themselves!
I agree with Stephen. Specially for DPM and StoRM, that are widely known and used. It's a bit unnatural to me to call them now org.ogf.glue.dpm or org.ogf.glue.storm. Moreover, they currently publish DPM and StoRM, so it's not a good idea to change it.
Then I suggest we simply use dpm storm At least let it be all lower-case as it is mandated by the schema document (Appendix B in GFD.147 says "enumeration values MUST be lower-case"). SToRM is absolutely not acceptable for me, since the schema is case sensitive (remember my comments on case?) what do you guys think? what do developers think? Cheers, Florido -- ================================================== Florido Paganelli ARC Middleware Developer - NorduGrid Collaboration System Administrator Lund University Department of Physics Division of Particle Physics BOX118 221 00 Lund Office Location: Fysikum, Hus B, Rum B313 Office Tel: 046-2220272 Email: florido.paganelli@REMOVE_THIShep.lu.se Homepage: http://www.hep.lu.se/staff/paganelli ==================================================