Sergio Andreozzi [mailto:sergio.andreozzi@cnaf.infn.it] said:
we might want to add the association from AccessProtocol to StorageShare; what do people think about this?
I would like to know what the real use-case is first. If this is really something specific to a particular VO and site then it might be better to e.g. use a ShareCapability or ShareOtherInfo.
also here... I think Riccardo is right. The association from StorageShare to DataStore should be changed from StorageShare to StorageResource... alternatively, we can add in parallel if people really want to discover the type of data store on which a storage share is configured.
I think we should keep the Share - Datastore relation as you can't deduce it in general if you only have Share - Resource. Maybe we could add a Share - Resource relation as well - but do we need it explicitly in the model if it's implied by the existing relations? Stephen