Sergio, I can attend at this time for one hour - if anybody cares to tell me how to phone in. I am supposed to be responsible for the service stuff in GLUE and that the schema proposed here is a step back from what we have now and will mess up what we are trying to do with service discovery in SAGA. It does not "incorporate the concepts of GLUE 1.3" I had missed the document when it was first announced on the 3rd April as the subject said "focusing on the CE". What do you suggest, should I propose an alternative? I don't want to start the public discussion at OGF20 with your definition of service. As part of the OGF20 meetings we will probably have to revisit the issue of what we mean by optional parameters. This discussion dried up a while ago but it was never resolved. I still insist that the logical modelling has nothing to do with what the implementers/sys-admins may choose to publish. Steve
-----Original Message----- From: glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Maarten Litmaath Sent: 02 May 2007 09:24 To: Sergio Andreozzi Cc: glue-wg@ogf.org Subject: Re: [glue-wg] GLUE WG phoneconf - 3 May - 4 PM CEST
Sergio Andreozzi wrote:
Dear all,
we would like to have a phoneconference before the OGF20. Time and agenda are available at this page:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.glue- wg/wiki/PhoneMeeting20070503
What is the phone number? _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg