Hi JP, I've submitted the GFD draft with the XSD included for public comment - this is the same as most OGF XSD docs I've seen. If necessary, we can remove the XSD toward the end of the public comment phase, but for now I think it's probably more useful it being in there for review purposes. Cheers, David
-----Original Message----- From: glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:glue-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Andre Merzky Sent: 26 March 2013 21:58 To: JP Navarro Cc: glue-wg@ogf.org Subject: Re: [glue-wg] author list for XML rendering
Well, the schema should eventually appear under http://schemas.ogf.org/, and thus becomes 'usable in it's native form', right? But most groups so far included their schemas in the document, mostly to have some normative document to point to I guess.
My $0.02,
Andre.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, JP Navarro <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
Ah, it's staring me in the face! I was looking in redmine.
I agree, the XML schema should be a separate document published along with the descriptive one, that way the published schema is usable in it's native form..
JP
On Mar 26, 2013, at 4:27 PM, <stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
JP Navarro [mailto:navarro@mcs.anl.gov] said:
What document are you referring to?
The one that was attached to the mail I replied to!
Stephen
-- Scanned by iCritical.
_______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
-- Nothing is really difficult. _______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg -- Scanned by iCritical.