Well, the schema should eventually appear under http://schemas.ogf.org/, and thus becomes 'usable in it's native form', right? But most groups so far included their schemas in the document, mostly to have some normative document to point to I guess. My $0.02, Andre. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM, JP Navarro <navarro@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
Ah, it's staring me in the face! I was looking in redmine.
I agree, the XML schema should be a separate document published along with the descriptive one, that way the published schema is usable in it's native form..
JP
On Mar 26, 2013, at 4:27 PM, <stephen.burke@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
JP Navarro [mailto:navarro@mcs.anl.gov] said:
What document are you referring to?
The one that was attached to the mail I replied to!
Stephen
-- Scanned by iCritical.
_______________________________________________ glue-wg mailing list glue-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/glue-wg
-- Nothing is really difficult.