On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Daniel Templeton wrote:

I'm in the job template section of the C binding now, and I noticed that none of the functions there return DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_ACTIVE_SESSION. Is that intentional? If so, I need to fix the Java language binding spec.

I believe it is not intensional. With C binding in mind one one could argue it is unlikely a session is needed before those functions can be used. But Java binding clearly indicates those C functions must be allowed to return DRMAA_ERRNO_NO_ACTIVE_SESSION. Regards, Andreas