9 Jul
2006
9 Jul
'06
9:31 p.m.
hello, As far as I know, the specification doesn't state that job status should be reflected in the very next drmaa_job_ps() call after changing it with drmaa_control(). Is it true, or did you actually intent to make drmaa_control() synchronize the job status change? -- Piotr Domagalski
10 Jul
10 Jul
8:50 a.m.
New subject: [drmaa-wg] job state change
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Piotr Domagalski wrote:
hello,
As far as I know, the specification doesn't state that job status should be reflected in the very next drmaa_job_ps() call after changing it with drmaa_control().
Right.
Is it true, or did you actually intent to make drmaa_control() synchronize the job status change?
Don't think so. Such a synchronization were rather problematic. Regards, Andreas
7210
Age (days ago)
7211
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Andreas.Haas＠Sun.COM -
Piotr Domagalski