I won't be able to make the call. I have another meeting I have to go to. Daniel Hrabri Rajic wrote:

The bi-weekly DRMAA call is scheduled for 16:00 UTC (8:00PDT - Pacific Daylight Time /10:00CDT/ 17:00 Central Europe). All Participants should use the following information to reach the conference call:

------------------------------------ * Toll Free Dial In Number for North America: 1 800 867-8609 * Toll Free Dial In Number for Germany: 0 800 101-4546 * Int'l Access/Caller Paid Dial In Number: +49 069509594678 * ACCESS CODE: 7223898 ------------------------------------

Attachments to this email:

- Oct 31 meeting minutes

Meeting Agenda:

A. Meeting secretary for this meeting?

B. Acceptance of the Oct 31, 2006 meeting minutes

C. Admin - Language independent DRMAA recommendation document status

F. Open/general issues discussion - IDL and Java bindings doc progress - misc

Cheers,

Hrabri

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: [DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Oct 31, 2006 call meeting minutes From: Peter Troeger <peter.troeger@hpi.uni-potsdam.de> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:49:02 -0600 To: DRMAA Working Group <drmaa-wg@ogf.org>

To: DRMAA Working Group <drmaa-wg@ogf.org>

Meeting minutes of the DRMAA Oct 31, 2006 con call:

- Last meeting minutes accepted, including participant list - Hrabri will ask area directors for status of DRMAA submission (done) - IDL: Agreed that SPI concept will be removed from spec - Particular implementation is language-dependent - IDL: Querying of exitStatus / termSignal when information is not available (ifExited / ifSignaled == false) - Should lead to "IllegalStateException" in IDL spec - Case not clearly described in C binding - Existing C implementations seem to use DRMAA_ERRNO_INVALID_ARGUMENT in this case - Peter will create tracker item with deferred status for C spec, due to pending DRMAA submission - IDL: Problem of reading / writing implementation-dependent job template attributes - C-like solution needed for DRM-independent DRMAA applications with DRM-dependent code parts - Agreement that get_attribute() and set_attribute() will be again part of JobTemplate interface - Language bindings must always provide JobTemplate attributes, and may offer also get_attribute() / set_attribute() functions when needed - IDL tracker item 1729 - Relax demand so that basic IDL types are always pass-by-value, and 'complex' types have a unified semantic, defined by the language binding - Peter will answer the tracker - Hrabri will ask area directors for operational procedures regarding "IDL 1.1" submission

Regards, Peter.

-- drmaa-wg mailing list drmaa-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- drmaa-wg mailing list drmaa-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg