2011/6/22 Daniel Gruber <dgruber@univa.com>:

    Why is the Monitoring session handled differently, i.e. has no

   name/open/destroy?

Monitoring session have no persistency, so they need no name for opening,

and no destruction.

If something has a create, I would expect it to have a destroy, too.

That might just be me, but semantically those two go together...

Anyway, your explanation helps!

It is a runtime object, IMHO even a singleton.

If it is a singleton which is already instantiated (e.g. by loading
the library), then it is being opened, not created?

Anyway, I begin to understand the model - much appreciated...  One
might want to make those things clearer in the spec though, as others
will likely stumble over similar questions?


Cheers, Andre.


--
Nothing is ever easy...