The fact that multiple DRM systems already implement 1.0 and call it 1.0? Daniel Rajic, Hrabri wrote:
Given that we have not submitted DRMAA Java bindings to OGF yet, there should not be a problem calling this version 1.0 to have 1:1 mapping with IDL doc.
The document history could be captured in the document itself, so the previous readers do not get utterly confused.
What are the obstacles for the above proposal?
Hrabri
-----Original Message----- From: drmaa-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:drmaa-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On
Behalf
Of Daniel Templeton Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 3:13 PM To: DRMAA Working Group Subject: [DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Java[TM] Language Binding Specification 1.0.1
All,
Attached is the 1.0.1 version of the specification. (Per my last
email,
the version number may change.) The only change from 1.0 is the deprecation of the getJobProgramStatus() method in favor of getJobStatus() to reflect a similar change in the final IDL binding
spec.
Daniel
-- drmaa-wg mailing list drmaa-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg