2 May
2007
2 May
'07
3:57 a.m.
We already deliberated this one, ad nausuem. I was on the pro side, but I was the only one. On the up side, the drmaa_wait() semantics allow the use of DRMAA_JOB_IDS_SESSION_ANY to easily implement notifications. Daniel On May 1, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Rajic, Hrabri wrote:
Issue:
We believe that a new routine for job status change monitoring, e.g. transition into the RUNNING state, would provide a usefully feedback for the end user. ---------------
We are talking about notifications here, right? This needs to be deliberated in future versions.
-Hrabri -- drmaa-wg mailing list drmaa-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/drmaa-wg