Hi all, On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Peter Tröger <peter@troeger.eu> wrote:
Preliminary meeting agenda:
1. Meeting secretary for this meeting? 2. Answering the public comments for the Python spec:
http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/comment.php?id=283
3. DRMAA2 feature discussion (PT8 - backward compatibility, PT9 to PT11 - new job state model):
http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/2008-September/000926.html
I won't be there, but could you please also decide on the recent testsuite changes suggestions? http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/2008-November/000965.html To sum up: - what should we do with the exit status 0 - 255 test as some DRMS aren't able to use > 128 because of the way shell works, - this is obvious to me, but anyway -- fix lines 2205-2206 in trunk's test_drmaa.c: // DRMAA must tell us that the job was signalled and exited (see GFD 133) if (!check_term_details(stat, 0, 1, 1)) return 1; -- Piotr Domagalski