X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Received: from fmsmsx312.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.227]) by
 fmsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
 Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:54 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: from scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.3.90.12]) by
 fmsmsx312.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
 Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:54 -0700
Received: from scsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.3.90.6]) by
 scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
 Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:53 -0700
Received: from scsmsxvs040.sc.intel.com ([10.3.90.8]) by
 scsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
 Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:53 -0700
Received: from scsfmr100.sc.intel.com ([10.3.253.9]) by
 scsmsxvs040.sc.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.7.47) with SMTP id M2005090610444925112
 for <hrabri.rajic@intel.com>; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:44:49 -0700
Received: from scsfmr002.sc.intel.com (scsfmr002.sc.intel.com [10.3.252.9]) by
 scsfmr100.sc.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.2 2004/09/17
 18:05:01 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j86HlOvq006744 for
 <hrabri.rajic@intel.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:47:24 GMT
Received: from mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov (mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
 [140.221.10.4]) by scsfmr002.sc.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d:
 major-outer.mc,v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id
 j86Hiio4019946 for <hrabri.rajic@intel.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:44:48 GMT
Received: by mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov (Postfix) id 0D36B12AC0;
 Tue,  6 Sep 2005 12:44:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id F084C12A52 for
 <grdfm-drmaa-wg-outgoing@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov>;
 Tue,  6 Sep 2005 12:44:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov (Postfix, from userid 83) id 1A49612ABF;
 Tue,  6 Sep 2005 12:44:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov
 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FA312ABF for
 <grdfm-drmaa-wg@mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov>;
 Tue,  6 Sep 2005 12:44:35 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgate2.Cadence.COM (mailgate2.Cadence.COM [158.140.2.31]) by
 mailbouncer.mcs.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997AA12A52 for
 <drmaa-wg@gridforum.org>; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 12:44:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from grinch.Cadence.COM (grinch.Cadence.COM [158.140.5.124]) by
 mailgate2.Cadence.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00254 for
 <drmaa-wg@gridforum.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grinch.Cadence.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
 grinch.Cadence.COM (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j86HiTfF026673 for
 <drmaa-wg@gridforum.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from rogerb@localhost) by grinch.Cadence.COM
 (8.12.9+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id j86HiSAV026670;
 Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: [drmaa-wg] DRMAA-WG Sep 6,2005 call minutes
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:44:28 -0700
Message-ID: <17181.54652.810152.351057@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [drmaa-wg] DRMAA-WG Sep 6,2005 call minutes
Thread-Index: AcWzCrHOlNhvZOjvTViy7j1EgfrgBA==
From: "Roger Brobst" <rogerb@cadence.com>
Sender: <owner-drmaa-wg@ggf.org>
To: "DRMAA Working Group" <drmaa-wg@gridforum.org>
Reply-To: <rbrobst@cadence.com>


Attendees:
    Peter Troeger
    Roger Brobst
    Daniel Templeton
    Andreas Haas

Meeting Agenda:

> A. Meeting secretary for this meeting?

    Roger

> B. Acceptance of the Aug 9, 2005 meeting minutes

    Accepted without change request

> C. Admin

    - Proceeding with 2 experience documents (SGE & Condor)
    - Timetable to be pursued on a "best-effort" basis

> F. Open/general issues discussion

    - Rough consensus for Experience documents to discuss possible
      solutions to issues which were identified, and defer updates
      to Lang-Independent-Spec.
    - Experiences gained from IDL-spec will be incorporated into
      SGE experience doc.
    - Working-Group needs to collect experiences and associate with
      appropriate document. Perhaps use Tracker "group" to categorize.
    - We will need to carefully consider compatibility.
      Compatible enhancements deemed "minor" will most likely be=20
      included in "End User Experiences" section of appropriate doc.

