Consider the following IMF headers:
Message-ID:
dfdl:initiator="Message-ID Message-Id"
i.e., it's a whitespace separated list of alternatives.
There's also a property called dfdl:ignoreCase="yes", but that would allow
"mEssAge-iD" as well, which you probably don't want.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Garriss Jr., James P.
Consider the following IMF headers:****
** **
Message-ID: < CACQ76nh2VDypuwm1aHc1-s8ZmmyXg8XEosS6af6yurkVdT+8QQ@mail.gmail.com>****
Message-Id: <208E8372-A9D9-468A-9B4B-BD97ED28F64C@garriss.org>****
** **
Notice the difference: ** **
** **
Message-ID: ****
vs ****
Message-Id:****
** **
Per the RFC, only the first is legal, but both are used in practice, and we’d like to allow either. In our DFDL schema, “Message-ID” is an initiator, but suddenly we have two alternate initiators for the same element.****
** **
How we model this in DFDL?****
** **
TIA****
-- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
-- Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com
Elegant. Thank you.
From: Mike Beckerle [mailto:mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:04 PM
To: Garriss Jr., James P.
Cc: dfdl-wg@ogf.org
Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] Alternate Initiators?
dfdl:initiator="Message-ID Message-Id"
i.e., it's a whitespace separated list of alternatives.
There's also a property called dfdl:ignoreCase="yes", but that would allow "mEssAge-iD" as well, which you probably don't want.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Garriss Jr., James P.
See the property description in the DFDL spec for dfdl:initiator. It can
be a space-separated list (there are several DFDL properties like this).
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, Data Format Description Language (DFDL)
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: "Garriss Jr., James P."
participants (3)
-
Garriss Jr., James P. -
Mike Beckerle -
Steve Hanson