1. Remaining 037 review issues A: 16.2 scannablility with lengthKind pattern: Confirm that this is what we agreed In summary, you can use a data pattern on any element (complex, simple text, simple binary) as long as the bytes are legal in the stated encoding, which where binary data is involved in practice means an 8-bit ASCII encoding. By 8-bit ASCII we really mean an encoding where all the codepoints from 0-255 map to the equivalent value. Subsequent investigation indicates that 'all' 8-bit ASCII encodings have gaps so there isn't a valid character. Mike has suggested 1) for all ascii-based character sets, we say that bytes 0x00 to 0xFF all map to exactly those codepoints in ISO 10646 for the infoset, and vice versa. 2) define dfdl:encoding="bytes" as a special character set name which has the above property. Briefly discussed but no conclusion. B: Glossary Variable-Occurrence Item - Optional elements have a variable number of occurrences (0 or 1) and arrays also can have a variable number of occurrences (when minOccurs < maxOccurs). So when we say an item with a variable number of occurrences, this can mean either an optional element, or an array where minOccurs < maxOccurs. In either array or optional elements, we have the additional constraint that the DFDL representation properties do not preclude a variable number of occurrences. When dfdl:occursCountKind='explicit' and dfdl:occursCount has a literal constant as its value, or an expression that statically evaluates to a constant, then the DFDL properties are specifying exactly the number of occurrences for all instances and so are said to preclude a variable number of occurrences. If dfdl:occursCount has a formula as its expressed value, then the DFDL properties do not preclude a variable number of occurrences. MikeB Comment: This idea that you can have minOccurs < maxOccurs, but dfdl:occurs is equal to a constant and dfdl:occursKind="explicit" is causing us a bunch of grief in these definitions. Can we be conservative and just say it is a schema definition error if minOccurs < maxOccurs but the length is static, i.e., an explicit constant-valued expression? C: DFDL Schema Component Model What needs to be changed in the UML diagram? D: Sequence Groups Mike B: TBD: rewrite these property descriptions in terms of the grammar for sequences Specifically, this is where the FinalUnused Region must be described. E: Check other comments in document. 2. Go through Actions Current Actions: No Action 049 20/05 AP Built-in specification description and schemas 03/06: not discussed 24/06: No Progress 24/06: No Progress (hope to get these from test cases) 15/07: No progress. Once available, the examples in the spec should use the dfdl:defineFormat annotations they provide. ... 14/10: no progress 21/10: Discussed the real need for this being in the specification. It seemed that the main value is it define a schema location for downloading 'known' defaults from the web. 28/10: no progress 04/11: no progress 11/11: no update 18/11: no update 25/11: Agreed to try to produce for CSV and fixed formats 04/12: no update 09/12: no update 16/12: no update 23/12: no update 06/01: no progress. If there is no resource to complete this action it can be deferred 13/01:no progress 20/01: no progress 27/01: no progress 29/01: No progress. The predefined formats do not need to be available when the spec is published. Suman said that he had been mapping COBOL structures to DFDL and it didn't look as though the way text numbers are define is very usable. He will document for next call 03/02: No progress 10/02: No progress 17/03: No progress 066 Investigate format for defining test cases 25/11:IBM to see if it is possible to publish its test case format. 04/12: no update 09/12: no update 16/12: reminded dent to project manager 23/12: SH will send another reminder. 06/01: Another reminder will be sent 13/01: no update 20/01: no update 27/01: no progress 29/01: no progress 03/02: IBM is still investigating 10/02: IBM is still investigating 17/02: IBM is willing in principle to publish the test case format and some of the test cases. May need some time to build a 'compliance suite' 079 MB:Encoding for binary fields when lenghtkind is pattern 17/02: Discussed but no conclusion 080 AP:Clarify semantics of fn:poisition and fn:count 17/02: no progress 081 AP: Inf and Nan The description is the way ICU behaves but need clarification. It isn't clear how inf and Nan are represented in the infoset. Need to investigate if XML allows these values 17/02: XML allows Nan and inf for float and double Dfdl will do the same. Requires more investigation of ICU. 3 DFDL v1 Specification completion. Draft 039 will be publish today. WG review and Comments by 3 March Draft 40 with updates for OGF submission - available 5 March Regards Alan Powell Development - MQSeries, Message Broker, ESB IBM Software Group, Application and Integration Middleware Software ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IBM MP211, Hursley Park Hursley, SO21 2JN United Kingdom Phone: +44-1962-815073 e-mail: alan_powell@uk.ibm.com Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU