Have updated for comments.

(See attached file: DFDL_Indirection_v5.docx)

Regards,

Bradd Kadlecik
z/TPF Development

Phone: 1-845-433-1573
E-mail: braddk@us.ibm.com
2455 South Rd
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-5400
United States

Steve Hanson---07/24/2020 01:08:03 PM---"Actually, the target of the indirection is just like an element or model-group, except without ali

From: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM
To: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
Cc: Bradd Kadlecik <braddk@us.ibm.com>, DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>
Date: 07/24/2020 01:08 PM
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DFDL-WG] DFDL pointer & offset proposal

"Actually, the target of the indirection is just like an element or model-group, except without alignment regions. Ugly to have to repeat the whole grammar for that. ".

Correct, and I haven't. My changes are for the indirection value, not the target. We have to handle 'indirectionUnusedValue' and reflect that initiator & terminator do not apply.

Regards

Steve Hanson

IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday

From: Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To: Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com>
Cc: Bradd Kadlecik <braddk@us.ibm.com>, DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>
Date: 24/07/2020 13:59
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DFDL-WG] DFDL pointer & offset proposal

Actually, the target of the indirection is just like an element or model-group, except without alignment regions. Ugly to have to repeat the whole grammar for that.
Perhaps we can get away with just documenting that the alignment regions must be zero length when target of an indirection? I did not try to put this modified grammar into my commented copy of the proposal (attached).

The "connection" to the indirect pointer or offset is not something that the grammar can express.

Attached
* my review (with new comments that start with "V4:"),
* my first cut of a DFDL schema for TIFF v6.0,
* a copy of the TIFF v6.0 spec.

I wasn't actually able to pull off TIFF. Comments in the schema discuss why, which is due to TIFF being a linked list, and I'm not able to terminate the chain.

There's maybe a trick using negative offsets, but I don't want to consider that yet, as those are entirely problematic.

Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Owl Cyber Defense | www.owlcyberdefense.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 7:03 AM Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Bradd, Mike - as discussed on WG call please review my version of the grammar for next call.

The key issue is how to link the target of the indirection into the main grammar, as it is dis-contiguous.

Regards

Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday

From: Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM
To: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM
Cc: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org>, Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
Date: 23/07/2020 14:52
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DFDL-WG] DFDL pointer & offset proposal

I incorporated some of your grammar changes but had a few modifications of my own we can discuss further in case I'm not understanding some of the subtleties. I think there may be a case for a nil value with indirection however as well. I've updated the document to include the changes as version 4.

Regards,

Bradd Kadlecik
z/TPF Development


Phone: 1-845-433-1573 E-mail: braddk@us.ibm.com	2455 South Rd Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-5400 United States

From: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM
To: Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org>, Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
Date: 07/10/2020 08:11 AM
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DFDL-WG] DFDL pointer & offset proposal

I think 'indirect' in property names should be 'indirection', so I will assume that in what follows.

I am not happy with 'indirectionEmptyValue' or 'indirectionMissingValue'. Both 'empty' and 'missing' are concepts with well-defined meanings in DFDL. How about 'indirectionInactiveValue' or better 'indirectionUnusedValue'?

My stab at an updated grammar below (changes in blue). There is no concept of an empty indirection value or a nil indirection value, so we don't need those clauses.

I also think we can simplify the EnclosedElement construct (changes in red)

Bradd I know you were struggling with how to link the target of the indirection into the main grammar, as it is dis-contiguous. I think we can achieve that by incorporating the target(s) into the Document as a whole.

If we think that the concept of an indirection can only ever happen inside a complex type, then we could move IndirectionRep from SimpleElement/ComplexElement to EnclosedElement.

I don't think it is worth getting more specific with IndirectElement. Specifically, it has no LeadingAlignment or TrailingAlignment, but to reflect that requires duplicating most of the rest of the grammar.

You have not disallowed lengthKind 'prefixed' for the 'indirectionType', so that is included in the grammar.

Productions

AbsentElementRep = Absent

IndirectionRep = IndirectionLeftFraming PrefixLength IndirectionContent
IndirectionRightFraming

IndirectionLeftFraming = LeadingAlignment
IndirectionRightFraming = TrailingAlignment

IndirectionContent = LeftPadding [ IndirectionValue | IndirectionUnusedValue ] RightPadOrFill

IndirectionValue = SimpleValue

SimpleEmptyElementRep = EmptyElementLeftFraming EmptyElementRightFraming
ComplexEmptyElementRep = EmptyElementLeftFraming EmptyElementRightFraming

EmptyElementLeftFraming = LeadingAlignment EmptyElementInitiator PrefixLength
EmptyElementRightFraming = EmptyElementTerminator TrailingAlignment

SimpleLiteralNilElementRep = NilElementLeftFraming [NilLiteralCharacters |
NilElementLiteralContent] NilElementRightFraming
ComplexLiteralNilElementRep = NilElementLeftFraming NilLiteralValue NilElementRightFraming

NilElementLeftFraming = LeadingAlignment NilElementInitiator PrefixLength
NilElementRightFraming = NilElementTerminator TrailingAlignment

NilElementLiteralContent = LeftPadding NilLiteralValue RightPadOrFill

SimpleNormalRep = LeftFraming PrefixLength SimpleContent RightFraming
ComplexNormalRep = LeftFraming PrefixLength ComplexContent ElementUnused
RightFraming

LeftFraming = LeadingAlignment Initiator
RightFraming = Terminator TrailingAlignment

PrefixLength = SimpleContent | PrefixPrefixLength SimpleContent
PrefixPrefixLength = SimpleContent

SimpleContent = LeftPadding [ NilLogicalValue | SimpleValue ] RightPadOrFill

ComplexContent = Sequence | Choice

Sequence = LeftFraming SequenceContent RightFraming
SequenceContent = [ PrefixSeparator EnclosedContent [ Separator EnclosedContent ]*
PostfixSeparator ]

Choice = LeftFraming ChoiceContent RightFraming
ChoiceContent = [ EnclosedContent ] ChoiceUnused

EnclosedContent = [ EnclosedElement | Array | Sequence | Choice ]

Array = [ EnclosedElement [ Separator EnclosedElement ]* [ Separator StopValue] ]

StopValue = SimpleElement

LeadingAlignment = LeadingSkip AlignmentFill
TrailingAlignment = TrailingSkip
RightPadOrFill = RightPadding | RightFill | RightPadding RightFill

Regards

Steve Hanson

IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday

From: Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM
To: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM
Cc: DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, "dfdl-wg" <dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org>, Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
Date: 09/07/2020 15:09
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DFDL-WG] DFDL pointer & offset proposal

I have updated the document proposal with proposed DFDL grammar changes:
[attachment "DFDL_Indirection_v3.docx" deleted by Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM]

Regards,

Bradd Kadlecik
z/TPF Development


Phone: 1-845-433-1573 E-mail: braddk@us.ibm.com	2455 South Rd Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-5400 United States

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU[attachment "TIFF-v6.pdf" deleted by Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM] [attachment "DFDL_Indirection_v4_mjb_comments.docx" deleted by Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM] [attachment "tiff.dfdl.xsd" deleted by Bradd Kadlecik/Poughkeepsie/IBM]