One comment on bit order v3.2, and a couple
on suggested feature v3.0 - search for 2014-08-22.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM
DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From:
Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To:
Steve Hanson/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
Cc:
"dfdl-wg@ogf.org"
<dfdl-wg@ogf.org>
Date:
18/08/2014 21:00
Subject:
Re: [DFDL-WG]
posted draft r21 and bit-order-features 3.1
I have added your changes to spec version r21 into r22
that I am preparing.
The changes to the bit order document are bigger, so I
have posted v3.2 of it which addresses your comments on it. (on redmine)
I have shortened the "Additional
Suggested DFDL Features to Simplify Modeling of MIL-STD-2045" memo
(on redmine) to incorporates simplifications (actually to remove some suggested
needs) and incorporate the stop-indicator approach (all from email: Review
of draft-gwdi-mil-std-2045-additional-features email of July 28.)
....mikeb
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology
| www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email
discussions are subject to the OGF
Intellectual Property Policy
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com>
wrote:
Erratum raised for the byteOrder changes,
and a new revision of draft-gwde-dfdl-experience-1 created and posted.
Several minor editorial changes made to spec draft r21, please merge in.
The ToC needs regenerating (or editing) as the removal of bit order
from the new appendix has shuffled things up slightly.
Re-reviewed bit order document, added some new comments primarily concerned
with making sure that other parts of the spec are updated where necessary
(search for 2014-08-06). I think we are close, but would appreciate other
WG members reviewing also.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM
DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: Mike
Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org"
<dfdl-wg@ogf.org>,
Date: 04/08/2014
16:39
Subject: [DFDL-WG]
posted draft r21 and bit-order-features 3.1
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
I've posted revised draft of the spec r21 (has changes to DFDL Standard
Character sets per call today)
I also made corrections to dfdl:byteOrder - added missing binary booleans
as one of the things byteOrder applies to, and removed sequence, choice,
group from things that can carry the byteOrder property. Having done these
fixes I realized this probably requires an erratum actually.
r21 is at http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13318
I've posted bit-order-features 3.1. This is http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13317
Language revised to make bitOrder more primitive than byteOrder - applies
to all grammar regions. Also added implicit-aligning to byte boundary on
a bit-order change.
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF
Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU