Tracked by issue http://redmine.ogf.org/issues/232.
See suggested change to the other '208' example.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: Mike Beckerle
To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org"
Date: 09/10/2014 18:46
Subject: [DFDL-WG] spec bug in dfdl:hexBinary function example
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
In discussion of the dfdl:hexBinary function, it says literals are given
the smallest signed type that will hold them.
This example is therefore incorrect:
• dfdl:hexBinary(208) is the hexBinary value "D0". EXB
Should be value 00D0 since 208 is beyond the range of a signed byte, so
must be a signed short.
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU