Erratum raised for the byteOrder changes, and a new revision of
draft-gwde-dfdl-experience-1 created and posted.
Several minor editorial changes made to spec draft r21, please merge in.
The ToC needs regenerating (or editing) as the removal of bit order from
the new appendix has shuffled things up slightly.
Re-reviewed bit order document, added some new comments primarily
concerned with making sure that other parts of the spec are updated where
necessary (search for 2014-08-06). I think we are close, but would
appreciate other WG members reviewing also.
Regards
Steve Hanson
Architect, IBM DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group
IBM SWG, Hursley, UK
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
From: Mike Beckerle
To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org" ,
Date: 04/08/2014 16:39
Subject: [DFDL-WG] posted draft r21 and bit-order-features 3.1
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
I've posted revised draft of the spec r21 (has changes to DFDL Standard
Character sets per call today)
I also made corrections to dfdl:byteOrder - added missing binary booleans
as one of the things byteOrder applies to, and removed sequence, choice,
group from things that can carry the byteOrder property. Having done these
fixes I realized this probably requires an erratum actually.
r21 is at http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13318
I've posted bit-order-features 3.1. This is
http://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13317
Language revised to make bitOrder more primitive than byteOrder - applies
to all grammar regions. Also added implicit-aligning to byte boundary on a
bit-order change.
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology |
www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
