From: | DFDL <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com> |
To: | Steve Hanson/UK/IBM@IBMGB |
Cc: | Alan Powell/UK/IBM@IBMGB, "dfdl-wg@ogf.org" <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, "dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org" <dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org> |
Date: | 05/05/2009 15:35 |
Subject: | Re: [DFDL-WG] Infoset codepage |
"Mike Beckerle"
<mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org 05/05/2009 14:09
|
|
I wanted to comment on this.
There are three choices here:
1. unicode
codepoints - we may need to preserve the mapping table (from representation
encoding to unicode) as part of the infoset.
2. "As
Encoded" codepoints - we must add the encoding to the infoset.
3. Both
In favor of unicode codepoints - simplicity. Minor issue is that some mappings
will lose information making perfect round-tripping of string contents
impossible.
E.g., EBCDIC has two different line-endings both of which normally are
translated to ASCII/Unicode linefeed. Hence, translating back is ambiguous.
In favor of "as encoded" - simplicity. We just add an encoding
attribute to the string infoset object which returns the information that
the dfdl:encoding representation property contained. Note that the encoding
information really is already available via the schema component associated
with the string, so there is some redundancy here. Also, there's the issue
when dealing with this of whether one wants codepoints, or raw access to
the bytes. E.g., if the encoding is UTF-8 or shifted JIS, then the characters
take up 1 or more bytes. Do you want the bytes, or the interpreted code
points or both?
In favor of "both" - complexity, but eliminates all the ambiguity.
My suggestion: keep it simple for v1.0 - Choose number 1 - because we can
always expand the capabilities later by providing access to the unencoded
representation one way or another.
If you badly need infoset-level contents which expose the actual representation
character codes, you can always model this as an array of bytes instead
of a character string.
...mike
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL
WG Co-Chair | CTO | Oco, Inc.
Tel: 781-810-2125 | 100 Fifth Ave., 4th Floor, Waltham MA 02451
| mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU