1. Current Actions 2 Nils and Defaults. Reviewed Alan's latest draft v7. Please send comments before the call 3 DFDL property types and other issues. Tim has proposed more specific types for some properties. In particular separating the different kinds of entities. - Modify the meaning and usage of the type 'DFDL String Literal' and modify the remainder of the specification accordingly - Improve the description of DFDL entities to avoid confusion over the intended usage of raw byte values. - Clarify the standard sentence about forward references in DFDL expressions - the current text implied that the restrictions only applied to the unparser. 1.1 DFDL Properties Properties on DFDL annotations may be one or more of the following types · DFDL string literal he property value is a string that represents a sequence of literal bytes or characters which appear in the data stream. · List of DFDL string literals The property value is a space-separated list of DFDL string literals. When parsing, if more than one string literal in the list matches the portion of the data stream being evaluated then the longest matching string literal in the list must be used. When unparsing, the first string literal in the list must be used. · DFDL expression The property value is an DFDL subset XPath 2.0 expression that returns a value derived from other property values and/or from the DFDL infoset. · DFDL regular expression The property value is a regular expression that can be used as a pattern to calculate the length of an element by applying that pattern to the sequence of literal bytes or characters which appear in the data stream. · Enumeration The property value is one of the allowed values listed in the property description. · Simple Type The property value is a string that describes a logical value. The type of the logical value is one of the XML Schema simple types. · QName The property value is an XML Qualified Name as specified in ?Namespaces in XML ? 1.1.1.1 DFDL Entities in String Literals 1.1.1.1 Character classes in DFDL String literals 1.1.1.1 Raw byte values in DFDL String Literals 4. using textStringPadCharacter with charRef '%#r' on multi-byte encoding textStringPadCharacter DFDL String literal The padding character or byte value that is used when justifying or trimming text elements. A pad character can be specified using DFDL entities. A pad byte value must be specified using the %#r entity. DFDL validation rules - if a pad byte value is specified when lengthUnits='characters' then the encoding must be a fixed-width encoding. - if a pad character is specified when lengthUnits='bytes' then the pad character must be a single-byte character. If a pad byte value is specified when lengthUnits='characters' then padding and trimming must be applied using an array of N pad byte values, where N is the width of a character in the fixed-width encoding. Annotation: dfdl:element, dfdl:simpleType Would adding fillByte to dfdl:padChar enumeration make it clearer. padChar is a pad character (%#r not allowed) fillByte is a fill byte 5. nilIndicatorPath and nilIndicatorIndex properties These properties seem a bit of an anomaly. Tim has suggested they can be simplified. 6 Remove timing from dfdl:assert. As timing property has been removed from discriminators it is inconsistent to still have it on assert. Agreed There was also a discussion about adding a message property to discriminators which was inconclusive so decided not to change. 7. Splitting the specification in simpler sections. Concern has been raised that a full DFDL implementation is complicated and expensive. A number of reviewer have said that they might implement only part of the sepcification. It has been suggested that the WG should look to see if it possible to split the specification into more manageable optional sections. Current Actions: No Action 066 Investigate format for defining test cases 25/11:IBM to see if it is possible to publish its test case format. 04/12: no update ... 17/02: IBM is willing in principle to publish the test case format and some of the test cases. May need some time to build a 'compliance suite' 24/03: No progress 03/03: Discussions have been taking place on the subset of tests that will be provided. 10/03: work is progressing 17/03: work is progressing 31/03: work is progressing 14/04: And XML test case format has been defined and is being tested. 21/04. Schema for TDML defined. Need to define how this and the test cases will be made public 05/05: Work still progressing 12/05: Work still progressing 02/06: Work still progressing on technical and legal considerations 16/06: work continues 23/06: work continues 30/06: work continues 085 ALL: publicize Public comments phase to ensure a good review.. 14/04: see minutes 21/04: Press release, OMG and other standards bodies. 05/05: Alan and Steve H have contacted other standards bodies. Will ask them to add comments on spec 15/05: still no public comments 02/06: No public comments 16/06: Public comments period has ended with no external comments. Alan had posted changes made in draft 041. Steve suggested send a note to the WG highlighting these changes. Steve also suggested requesting an extension as other IBM groups may review. We discussed whether this was necessary as changes will need to be made during the implementation phase anyway. Alan to ask OGF what the process is for changes post public comment. 23/06: Still no comments. Alan will contact OGF to understand the rest of the process. 30/06: Alan has emailed Joel asking what the process is now public comment period is over andcan we update the published version with WG updates. No response yet. 086 AP: Nils and Defaults during unparsing - update table 31/03: TK to documetn use cases for parsing 14/04: Investigate new property to control empty string behaviour. 21/04: After investigation a new property is not required. New rules developed and tables updated. Need examples of complexTypes to confirm tables apply. Review Nils, defaulting spec section. 05/05: Discussed defaulting complex elements. Tables updated but need to add terminator. SH; to confirm WMD behaviour when infoset item has no value on unparsing Need to describe defaulting choices. 15/05: More discussion. Alan updating sections 26/05: Discussed draft updates. Stephanie to confirm asserts do not make an element required. Alan will update draft.. All: review rest of draft. 02/06: Alan updated description. Please review. Discussed Stephanie's example using discriminators. Decided no changes needed. 16/05: went through Steves comments. Steve to update draft. 23/06: Steve's updates to the rules discussed. See minutes. Rest of document needs updating. 30/06: Discussed Alans updates. Some corrections. Alan will send out updated copy for review before next call. 088 define semantics of choiceKind 'fixedLength' 31/03: TK to provide definition of calculable length. Investigate PL/I varchars and Cobol occurs dependingon. 14/04Tim had distributed a document starting the definition of calculable length for the longest choice member. Alan had done some investigation of COBOL occurs depending on and when used in the working section of a program then the maximum storage was reserved but when used in the linkage section the dependent number was uses. We need to understand how the WMB COBOL importer deals with ODO. 21/04: Need to define 'calculable length' and WMB importer ODO behaviour. 05/05: TK: Still need definition of calculable length. SKK: WMB COBOL imported behaviour with ODO 15/05: Suman sent an expmle of an imported Cobol ODo which suggested that the maximum space was reserved. He will extend the example. 02/06: no progress 16/06: no progress 23/06: no progress 30/06: Alan looked at Tim's description of calculable length and suggested that that real use case may be much simpler. If real use case is COBOL and C importers then it would be cleaner to require the 'fixed length' to be specified on the enclosing complex element and remove choiceKind 'fixed length'. Ask Suman is COBOL and C importers can be enhance to provide length on cpmplex element. 092 AP: Confirm behaviour of defaulting with various occursCountKinds and separator policies. 16/06: no progress 23/06: discussed - whether when number of instances doesn't match specified number of occurrences is it an error or should missing instances be defaulted? Decided it is an error. - defaulting occurs up to minoccurs unless separator policy is required when default up to maxOccurs and unbounded is an error. 30/06: Decided that defaulting for variable occurrence arrays should always be to minOccurs. If separatorPolicy is 'required' then just the separators will be output up to maxOccurs and unbounded is an error. 096 AP: using textStringPadCharacter with charRef '%#r' on multi-byte encoding 097 nilIndicatorPath and nilIndicatorIndex properties 099 Splitting the specification in simpler sections. Regards Alan Powell Development - MQSeries, Message Broker, ESB IBM Software Group, Application and Integration Middleware Software ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IBM MP211, Hursley Park Hursley, SO21 2JN United Kingdom Phone: +44-1962-815073 e-mail: alan_powell@uk.ibm.com Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU