I have a couple of expression language
queries
1. Accessing hidden values - it seems
inconsistent to allow access to hidden values when xpath is used within
the DFDL domain but not when used outside.
2. Where xpath is allowed in the schema
- It is currently allowed in an arbitrary set of properties (initiator,
terminator, separator, occurseparator, null, etc ). Why not allow it everywhere?
Alan Powell
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley, Winchester, SO21 2JN, England
Notes Id: Alan Powell/UK/IBM email: alan_powell@uk.ibm.com
Tel: +44 (0)1962 815073
Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898
Mike Beckerle <beckerle@us.ibm.com>
Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org
12/09/2007 16:10
|
To
| dfdl-wg@ogf.org
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [DFDL-WG] WG call 2007-09-12 |
|
I have two things that we can discuss:
The above is v3. It differs in that sequences with length were added. There's
an issue in comments of the doc we can discuss.
Also: a new related proposal below - I can overview this, but we don't
really need people to weigh in with opinions/decisions until more of a
chance to think it through.
...mikeb
Mike Beckerle
STSM, Architect, Scalable Computing
IBM Software Group
Information Platform and Solutions
Westborough, MA 01581
direct: voice and FAX 508-599-7148
assistant: Pam Riordan
priordan@us.ibm.com
508-599-7046
[attachment "proposal-to-simplify-opaque-types-v3.doc" deleted
by Alan Powell/UK/IBM] [attachment "proposal-to-simplify-hex-base64-v1.doc"
deleted by Alan Powell/UK/IBM] --
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU