Martin,
Please can you add a discussion of the semantics of DFDL Variables to the
agenda of tomorrow's telecon. I have attached a document with some thoughts
that I have had on the subject.
Regards,
Geoff Judd
Websphere MQ Integrator Development
IBM UK Ltd
Hursley
"Westhead, Martin
(Martin)" <westhead@avaya.com> Sent by: owner-dfdl-wg@ggf.org
30/11/2005 18:12
To
<dfdl-wg@ggf.org>
cc
Subject
[dfdl-wg] Telcon Notes
Present
-------
Mike Bekerle
Tara Talbott
Martin Westhead
Geoff Judd
Steve Hanson
Bob McGrath
Reports from Active Trackers
----------------------------
Scoping tracker is being worked on - no news.
Extensibility group is moving forward - nothing to report yet
Discussion of Geoff's documents
-------------------------------
Variables doc
Mike observed that variables could be used in place of his extensibility
proposal on annotations.
Martin asked about whether we wanted to include this in the standard. Is
the complexity worth the addition - the feeling of the meeting was
probably it was.
Martin proposed that instead of binding a variable value to an element,
the variable value should be set with an XPath expression.
Discussed the question as to whether the variable value can be reset,
whether it can/should be scoped in the same way as annotation
attributes.
Next step will be for Geoff to revise the document to look at cases
where value may need to be reset and start to explore some of the
semantic issues involved.
Choices doc
Discriminator type - what if discriminator is not a string? For
efficiency can we handle discriminators that are integers?
Suggest that instead of discriminators being computed to strings they
are computed to an XPath value with its implied type so that numeric
discriminators do need to be converted to strings.
Wildcard docs
Group seemed fairly happy with this proposal as it stands.