For discussion on next WG call: The description of the dfdl:lengthUnits property for enum 'bits' says (after errata 2.90): 'bits' may only be used for xs:boolean, xs:byte, xs:short, xs:int, xs:long, xs:unsignedByte, xs:unsignedShort, xs:unsignedInt, and xs:unsignedLong simple types with representation 'binary'. This is permitting binary numbers with dfdl:binaryNumberRep 'packed', 'bcd' and 'ibm4690Packed' to have dfdl:lengthUnits 'bits'. That could make sense, as one could have an odd number of nibbles packed into the minimum space possible - eg a BCD range 000-999 could occupy 12 bits. However, the words that have been added for errata 2.90 (allowing signed number types to have lengthUnits 'bits') to both the description of dfdl:lengthUnits and section 12.3.7.2 have assumed that only binaryNumberRep 'binary' is allowed. I tested IBM DFDL with 12-bit 'packed' and 'bcd' reps packed back-to-back with bit alignment and it parsed them ok, but gave an error when serializing, saying that binaryNumberRep must be 'binary'. Clearly incorrect because of the inconsistency, but what is the intent of the spec here? Regards Steve Hanson Architect, IBM Data Format Description Language (DFDL) Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group IBM SWG, Hursley, UK smh@uk.ibm.com tel:+44-1962-815848 Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU