Mike
I have reviewed the latest errata document
updates, and all looks good to me. No further comments.
Regards
Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM
DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday
From:
Mike Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To:
Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com>
Cc:
DFDL-WG <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>
Date:
16/10/2019 18:43
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] Re:
[DFDL-WG] Errata doc updated with draft errata 5.39 to 5.59 - from all
Trackers
I have responded to your comments with changes and reply
comments. I first accepted all changes, so you can see my refinements easily.
The resulting document has been uploaded as a new revision
of the errata spec for another review cycle: https://redmine.ogf.org/dmsf_files/13384?download=
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology
| www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email
discussions are subject to the OGF
Intellectual Property Policy
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:22 AM Steve Hanson <smh@uk.ibm.com>
wrote:
Mike
Comments added. I used LibreOffice I'm ok using this for adding comments
to small docs but not to the spec itself.
I've indicated below
and via email to you where significant comments apply.
Regards
Steve Hanson
IBM Hybrid Integration, Hursley, UK
Architect, IBM
DFDL
Co-Chair, OGF
DFDL Working Group
smh@uk.ibm.com
tel:+44-1962-815848
mob:+44-7717-378890
Note: I work Tuesday to Friday
From: Mike
Beckerle <mbeckerle.dfdl@gmail.com>
To: DFDL-WG
<dfdl-wg@ogf.org>
Date: 14/10/2019
19:58
Subject: [EXTERNAL]
[DFDL-WG] Errata doc updated with draft errata 5.39 to 5.59 - from
all Trackers
Sent by: "dfdl-wg"
<dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org>
I have updated our document gwde-dfdl-experience-4-v0.9.docx (The Errata
doc) with draft errata for all known issues that had trackers. This adds
Errata 5.39 to 5.59.
This is mostly just copying language that was in the trackers into the
Errata document, but in some cases language had to be consolidated across
the original tracker description and subsequent update comments. In some
cases I had to compose descriptive language.
5.41 is not complete, as it involves review of all occurrences of MUST,
MUST NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, etc. throughout the document. I plan to handle
this after all other errata are incorporated into the spec, with a single
sweep, then people can review by looking for those keywords.
In reviewing these errata, I suggest they are bucketed into those that
are not controversial, and are best reviewed by editing them into the specification,
and reviewing there, versus those where there is more concern as to whether
the described change is correct and complete.
The list of these new errata is below. They are not controversial (to me)
except where noted.
5.39
5.40
5.41 - one identified change not controvercial. The sweeping pass to examine
all MUST/SHOULD, etc. is separate.
5.42
5.43
5.44 - needs careful review
5.45 - needs careful review
5.46 - new language - needs review. It is a lengthy discussion. Perhaps
can be made shorter ?
5.47 - needs careful review
5.48 - do we need all 3 overloads of fn:error()? - also, all behavior here
is very implementation-dependent.
5.49
5.50
5.51
5.52
5.53
5.54
5.55
5.56
5.57
5.58
5.59 - needs careful review - description may not match desired/actual
behavior of implemetations
Mike Beckerle | OGF DFDL Workgroup Co-Chair | Tresys Technology | www.tresys.com
Please note: Contributions to the DFDL Workgroup's email discussions are
subject to the OGF
Intellectual Property Policy
--
dfdl-wg mailing list
dfdl-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU