Erratum 2.68 updated to reflect below. Spec draft r17 contains the change. Regards Steve Hanson Architect, IBM DFDL Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group IBM SWG, Hursley, UK smh@uk.ibm.com tel:+44-1962-815848 ----- Forwarded by Steve Hanson/UK/IBM on 22/07/2014 14:43 ----- From: Steve Hanson/UK/IBM To: "Cranford, Jonathan W." <jcranford@mitre.org>, Cc: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org" <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org Date: 09/07/2014 18:21 Subject: Re: [DFDL-WG] errata on number of fractional second digits Jonathan The two statements apply to different pattern symbols. The first is for the S symbol, the second is for the I symbol. However, it is clearer if the implementer uses the same precision for each, so the I symbol should change to match the S symbol. Regards Steve Hanson Architect, IBM DFDL Co-Chair, OGF DFDL Working Group IBM SWG, Hursley, UK smh@uk.ibm.com tel:+44-1962-815848 From: "Cranford, Jonathan W." <jcranford@mitre.org> To: "dfdl-wg@ogf.org" <dfdl-wg@ogf.org>, Date: 08/07/2014 16:07 Subject: [DFDL-WG] errata on number of fractional second digits Sent by: dfdl-wg-bounces@ogf.org Not sure if this has been addressed by a subsequent errata or not, but I just noticed something that should be corrected in the spec. Section 13.11.1 is on the dfdl:calendarPattern property. The following two statements are made about the number of fractional second digits. - "Any number of fractional seconds "S" may by specified in the pattern and accepted by implementations, but an implementation is free to represent a limited number of fractional seconds internally. Excess fractional seconds are truncated, not rounded up. At least millisecond accuracy must be implemented." (Section 13.11.1) - "The number of fractional second digits supported is implementation dependent but must be at least one." (Section 13.11.1) These two statements are not consistent. I believe the second one should be corrected to say that the minimum # of fractional second digits is three (to support a minimum of millisecond accuracy). I'm working through the last version that was put out for public comment (v1.0.4), so my apologies if this has already been corrected. FYI, -- Jonathan W. Cranford Senior Information Systems Engineer The MITRE Corporation (http://www.mitre.org) -- dfdl-wg mailing list dfdl-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/dfdl-wg Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU